A B2B platform you will not have to pay for twice.

A system where your business customers work independently instead of writing to your managers. We design portals and operational systems around real roles, decisions and processes.

Dealer portals · Corporate customer portals · HR tech and services for companies · Procurement platforms · Partner networks · Service marketplaces

Roles · Processes · Permissions · Data · Integrations · Scaling

“We need a dealer portal / partner portal” Which decisions should participants make independently?

Complexity

B2B-product complexity starts with interdependent decisions, not the number of features. that depend on one another.

Buyers, managers, partners, dealers, accountants, logistics staff and administrators may work in one system. Each has their own tasks, authority, constraints and context.

If you start with screens and a feature list, contradictions between these roles appear during development. We therefore design the interaction model first, and only then the interface.

Where the cost of a mistake appears

A single access decision changes the logic of orders, documents, approvals and reporting at once.

The more participants there are, the fewer decisions can be made locally: each one affects others.

An interface will not fix a process, that nobody has thought through.

If the product is bought by an end user, this is development digital products. If only your team uses the system, this is internal systems.

Map of participants, roles and dependencies in B2B platforms

Strategic-stage artefact · participants · decisions · dependencies

Architecture · product economics

A budget does not make a product an investment. The decisions built into its architecture make it one. decisions built into the architecture.

A company may spend a significant budget and get a working system without getting a product that supports the business.

Features may be implemented, interfaces designed and integrations connected. But if roles, data, rules and dependencies are designed incorrectly, every subsequent change becomes more expensive than the last.

Money spent

The product lives separately from the business

  • the system only duplicates the old process
  • every exception requires separate rework
  • logic is distributed between code, tables and people
  • changing one rule breaks several scenarios
  • the business must adapt to its own product
  • the next version effectively starts with redesign

Money invested

The product increases value at every stage

  • the product reduces dependence on manual work
  • new scenarios are added without rebuilding the foundation
  • business rules are fixed in the system
  • users can make decisions faster
  • the architecture supports new roles, markets and work models
  • each next stage increases the value already created

cost architecture visible not in day launch. Its value is visible in the cost of every next decision.

We design it so money invested today remains part of the product tomorrow.

When needed architecture

You need more than development when an error in product logic affects the work of the entire business.

Product strategy and architecture are needed when:

  1. 01requirements from departments conflict with one another
  2. 02several types of participants will work in the system
  3. 03one user’s decision changes the scenarios of others
  4. 04there are individual contracts, prices, limits or rules
  5. 05part of the process relies on spreadsheets, correspondence and individual knowledge
  6. 06a ready-made solution forces the business to change critical processes
  7. 07every new feature requires changes in several parts of the system
  8. 08the previous version already had to be rebuilt
  9. 09the team cannot agree on the first-version boundaries
  10. 10the system must integrate into the company’s existing digital landscape

The more decisions depend on one another, the more expensive it is to start with a feature list.

Strategy and architecture

Strategy determines the direction. Architecture turns it into a system of decisions.

In B2B and enterprise projects, almost every department has its own view of the system. Sales want flexibility, finance wants control, operations want standardisation, leadership wants transparency and customers want autonomy. All these requirements may be justified while conflicting with one another.

  1. 01Business goalWhat change the product must create.
  2. 02Product strategyFor whom, why and through what behaviour value is created.
  3. 03Product architectureHow participants, roles, scenarios, rules and data interact.
  4. 04InterfaceHow users make decisions inside the system.
  5. 05DevelopmentHow product logic becomes a working product.
  6. 06GrowthHow the system accommodates new roles, processes and business models.

Product architecture includes

ParticipantsRoles and authorityScenariosRulesDataGrowth
Product architecture diagram: journeys, rules and data

Strategic-stage artefact · scenarios · rules · data

Strategy is not a list of what we do. It is the boundary between what what creates value and what only spends the budget.

If there is no architecture between strategy and development, strategic decisions become wishes.

Method

Decisions must be made before the first layout, that determine the future of the entire product.

Nata Sheker personally makes key strategic and architectural decisions with the client team: strategic sessions, business-model decomposition, product logic and testing key decisions.

You work not with a manager who passes information between teams.

  1. 01

    We restore the real picture

    We speak with process participants and verify how work actually happens, not only how it is described in regulations.

  2. 02

    We find decision points

    We define where the user chooses, approves, checks, rejects or transfers accountability.

  3. 03

    We build the role model

    We record permissions, dependencies, exceptions and accountability boundaries.

  4. 04

    We design the architecture

    We connect scenarios, data and business rules into one coherent system.

  5. 05

    We test before development

    We model critical scenarios and find contradictions before they become expensive changes.

I — Focus

Strategic focus

Define what change the product must create and what must be left out.

II — Integrity

Architectural integrity

Verify that roles, rules, journeys and data do not contradict one another.

III — Consequences

Consequences of decisions

Understand how today’s decision will affect cost, speed and the product’s freedom to grow.

Our product is not the number of screens created. It is the quality of the decisions your system will rely on.

Result first stage

After the strategy and architecture stage, you are left not with a presentation, but with the foundation for product decisions.

  1. 01

    An agreed product model

    Who the system is for, what change it must enable and where its boundaries lie.

  2. 02

    Map of participants and responsibilities

    Who works with the system, which decisions they make and what they are responsible for.

  3. 03

    Key scenarios

    How users move from need to result and where decision points arise.

  4. 04

    Business rules model

    Contracts, prices, limits, statuses, exceptions and approvals.

  5. 05

    Data and integration architecture

    What information the system needs, where it comes from and who manages it.

  6. 06

    Boundaries first version

    What must be implemented first, what can wait and what should be dropped.

  7. 07

    Map of risks and uncertainties

    Which decisions must be tested before estimating full implementation.

  8. 08

    Basis for estimating development

    The team estimates an agreed product model, not an abstract list of requests.

Artefactand first stage: model product, map roles and boundaries first version

Materials that remain with the client after the first stage

The result has standalone value and does not oblige you to continue development with Sheker.Agency. You can use it to decide on implementation or hand the materials to your internal team.

Enterprise-context

What we account for in enterprise projects

B2B and enterprise platforms are almost never built from a blank sheet. They must work within the company’s existing operational and digital systems.

I

Existing systems

ERP, CRM, accounting, warehouse systems, analytics, document flow and internal services.

II

Data

Sources, structure, accountability, quality, access and synchronisation rules.

III

Security and permissions

Roles, access levels, critical actions, audit and accountability controls.

IV

Integrations

Dependencies between systems, API constraints, exchange stability and behaviour when errors occur.

V

Migration

What is migrated, what is cleaned, what stays in the legacy system and how the transition happens.

VI

Team and growth

How accountability is shared between Sheker.Agency and the client IT team, and how the system accommodates new roles, processes and markets.

We do not design a new product in a vacuum. We define its place in the company operating model and digital landscape.

After launch

Launch does not finish the architecture. It gives it real-world data.

After launch, we verify how the system works in real processes, where users bypass the designed logic and which decisions need to be made next.

01

Analysis of real-world use

02

Verification of key scenarios

03

Prioritisation of next changes

04

Architectural control of growth

When needed, we work with the internal product or IT team and pass on the context behind the decisions.

The goal of support is not to create a constant stream of revisions, but to preserve product integrity as it grows.

Selected projects

Not “we built a system”, but changed a business process.

We show the challenge, architectural decisions and changes in the operating model.

Format and cost

The budget is determined by the platform scope, not by the number of screens.

We define the first stage and its budget after discussing the challenge. We estimate implementation on the basis of the agreed architecture.

Strategy and architecture4–6 weeks

from $10 000

An interaction model and product logic documented before development begins.

  • Participants, roles and permissions
  • Scenarios and decision points
  • Rules, exceptions and approvals
  • Model data and integrations
  • First-version boundaries and success criteria

The stage has standalone value and does not oblige you to order further development.

Send an enquiry

Development platformsfrom 12 weeks

Tailored

Typical projects start at $50,000. The exact budget is determined after the strategy and architecture stage.

  • Number of participants and roles
  • Complexity of business rules
  • Data and integrations
  • Security requirements
  • Level of uncertainty
  • Launch and growth format

A platform is not evaluated by the number of screens.

Send an enquiry

Enquiry

If the product is important to the business operating model, do not start with a development estimate.

In the first conversation, we discuss the business model, participants, rules and decisions the system must support. We define where strategy and product architecture are needed, and where the challenge is ready for implementation.

If standard decisions are enough for the project, we will say so. If a flawed foundation could turn investment into cost, we will show this before development starts.







    We will send confirmation and a meeting link. No presentations – straight to your numbers.

    The first conversation is about your business and product, not about selling a development team. Internal processes, data and project materials will not be published or shared with third parties.

    INFO@SHEKER.AGENCY+38 097 789 84 09
    +38 098 698 94 77
    Viber · Telegram · WhatsApp