Conversion answers one question: how often did visitors choose you?

We find why users do not complete registration, onboarding, activation, payment or another key action — and turn behavioural data into product decisions.

Behaviour · Data · Research · Hypotheses · Experiments · Product changes

A change in perspective

Low conversion is not a single-screen problem. It is a symptom that the product and user did not reach agreement.

Every unfinished action reflects a specific user decision — conscious or automatic.

They may:

  • not understand the value
  • not trust the promise
  • not see the next step
  • consider the effort excessive
  • not be ready to provide data
  • not get the expected result
  • not find a feature
  • not understand what happened after clicking
  • not see reasons to return

We do not study the bounce rate alone. We study the decision behind it.

Illustration: user with an unfinished action

Not the funnel — behaviour

The user does not simply “drop out of the funnel”. They decide to stop.

  1. 01

    Saw → Understood

    “Is this even for me?”

  2. 02

    Understood → Believed

    “Why should I trust this?”

  3. 03

    Believed → Tried

    “Is this worth my time and data?”

  4. 04

    Tried → Received value

    “Where is the promised result?”

  5. 05

    Received value → Returned

    “Why use this again?”

  6. 06

    Returned → Paid

    “Why is this worth paying for?”

Conversion changes at transitions between states. That is where to look for the reason, not only at a weak screen.

Diagnostics

Problem may be not there, where the metric drops.

Offer

The user does not see enough value or understand whom the product is for.

Audience

The product attracts people whose needs do not match its core scenario.

Trust

The requested action requires more confidence than the product has built.

Interface

The next step is invisible, unclear or requires unnecessary actions.

Process

After the interface, the user encounters a slow response, manual approval or an unfulfilled promise.

The product itself

The user completes the scenario but does not get enough value to return or pay.

If you change only the screen when the cause lies in the offer or process, the interface becomes prettier but the user’s decision does not change.

Analytics versus research

Analytics shows where you lose the user. But it does not explain why they left.

What we can see

Data with analytics

  • 42{85c32a404beb3a17fad9859395e98171d5844d669a872c9f6728ab61e397d515} did not complete onboarding
  • Users leave the form at the third field
  • Users open the feature but do not use it
  • The trial ends without payment
  • Users do not return after the first day

Illustrative interface examples, not real customer metrics.

What we still do not know

Questions without answers

  • They did not understand the value
  • They do not trust it
  • They are not ready to provide information
  • They do not see the next step
  • They expected a different result
  • The product did not solve their real challenge
  • The barrier lies outside the interface

An event in analytics is a trace of behaviour. Not its cause.

More traffic does not fix a conversion problem. It makes the problem more expensive.

If a product loses users at registration, onboarding, activation or payment, additional acquisition only increases the number of people who encounter the same obstacle.

more traffic × unresolved cause = a more expensive loss

Before scaling acquisition, understand which part of acquired demand the product cannot turn into a valuable action.

Method

We do not collect a list of hypotheses. We build a system of evidence.

Evidence → Hypothesis → Change → Verification

  1. 01

    Business-context

    We define which user behaviour creates value for the product and business.

  2. 02

    Conversion map

    We record key states, transitions, micro-conversions and points of loss.

  3. 03

    Quantitative data

    We analyse actions, segments, cohorts, funnels, repeat use and differences between user groups.

  4. 04

    Qualitative data

    We study sessions, support requests, interviews, surveys, usability tests and behavioural context.

  5. 05

    Causes and hypotheses

    We connect observations to possible causes and formulate changes that can affect decisions.

  6. 06

    Verification

    We choose a method: prototype, usability test, staged rollout, A/B test or behavioural analysis after implementation.

Start with evidence. Then form a hypothesis. Then the change. Not the other way around.

Research

Every study starts not with a tool, but with questions.

  • 01

    Where does the loss occur?

    Funnels, actions, segments, cohorts and user journeys.

  • 02

    Who exactly stops?

    Source, device, plan, role, scenario, experience and behavioural segment.

  • 03

    What happens before the stop?

    Session recordings, action sequence, errors, returns and repeat attempts.

  • 04

    Why does the user stop?

    Interviews, surveys, usability tests, support, sales calls and open feedback.

  • 05

    What change could affect the decision?

    Prototypes, reason prioritisation, experiments and tests on real journeys.

A tool collects a signal. Expertise turns it into decisions.

Product decisions

Sometimes the best CRO decision is not to change the interface, but to change the offer or process itself.

Make the button more noticeable

Explain what happens after the click and why the user

Shorten the form

Change the moment when the product asks for data and explain why

Redo the onboarding

Bring the user to their first tangible value faster

Add hints

Remove logic that needs to be explained with hints

show more features

Help the user find one feature they need now

Run an A/B test

First formulate the reason the test should confirm or disprove

Change paywall

Rebuild the connection between received value and the moment of payment

We change not elements, but the decision path. We change the reasons why users do not act.

Verification

An A/B test does not create a strong hypothesis. It only tests it.

Not every product needs an A/B test. We choose the testing method based on traffic, risk and the nature of the change.

An experiment makes sense when

  • A specific problem is known
  • There is evidence of a possible cause
  • The change directly affects this cause
  • Primary and guardrail metrics are defined
  • The product has sufficient data volume
  • The result can be interpreted
  • The team is ready to implement the conclusion

Testing methods we use

  • Usability test
  • Prototype
  • Interview
  • Before/after analysis
  • Staged rollout
  • Feature flag
  • Cohort comparison
  • A/B test

We choose the testing method for the questions, not the other way around.

Result

Result CRO – not report. This is the decision system the team can work with.

Conversion map

Key states, transitions, micro-conversions and points of loss.

System measurement

A list of required events, parameters, segments and analytics gaps.

Evidence of causes

Quantitative and qualitative signals that explain user behaviour.

Priorities

Problems and opportunities assessed by impact, evidence, complexity and risk.

Product decisions

Specific changes to the offer, journeys, interface, onboarding or processes.

Plan testing

Metric, method, success terms and a way to interpret the result.

The team gets not a hundred backlog ideas but a reasoned sequence of decisions.

Suitability

CRO needed not every product.

It fits when

  • There are real users or stable traffic
  • The key product action is defined
  • Behavioural data has accumulated
  • The team is ready to change the product, not just the design
  • The result can be measured
  • Analytics, the team and users are accessible

Do not start with CRO when

  • Product still not has users
  • The problem is a lack of demand
  • The team is looking for a guaranteed growth percentage
  • There is no access to data
  • The product cannot be changed
  • Only confirmation of an already-made decision is needed

If CRO is not the right first step, we will say so before starting work.

Two decision logics

B2B and B2C can have the same conversion rate — but completely different reasons for loss.

A metric shows how many users moved to the next action. It does not show exactly how users made the decision.

In B2C, a person often decides alone, acts quickly and weighs value, price, trust and effort. In B2B, decisions may take weeks or months, pass through several roles and continue outside the product — in demos, correspondence, approvals, procurement and sales operations. The same CRO method cannot be applied mechanically to both.

B2C

Shorten the path to a personal decision

Saw → Understood → Believed → Tried → Received value → Paid → Returned

Who makes the decisionUsually one person can be the user, buyer and payer.

Typical journeyFrom several seconds to several days.

What affects conversion

  • Clear immediate value
  • Offer relevance
  • Price and terms, trust and speed
  • Ease of registration or payment
  • Early value delivery
  • Habit and reason to return

Typical losses

  • Value is not clear from first contact
  • The action requires too much effort
  • The product asks for data or payment too early
  • Onboarding delays the first result
  • There is no reason to return

Primary metrics

  • Registration
  • Onboarding
  • Activation rate
  • Trial-to-paid
  • Retention
  • Churn

CRO reduces uncertainty and unnecessary effort, shows value sooner and helps people move to the next state independently.

B2B

Help a decision pass through a system of people

Need → Research → Champion → Demo → Approval → Procurement → Implementation → Use

Who makes the decisionThe user, initiator, manager, CFO, IT, security, procurement and payer may be different people.

Typical journeyFrom several weeks to several months.

What affects conversion

  • Fit with the business challenge and a clear economic effect
  • Implementation risk, integrations and security
  • Proof of expertise and demo quality
  • Ability to justify the choice within the company
  • Speed and substance of communication after an enquiry

Typical losses

  • The product speaks only to the user but gives no arguments to the payer
  • The CTA asks for a decision the company is not ready to make
  • The enquiry is passed to sales without a defined next step
  • The demo shows features, not the business decision
  • Implementation breaks the expectations created during sales

Primary metrics

  • Qualified query
  • Show rate
  • Demo-to-opportunity
  • Opportunity-to-win
  • Adoption
  • Account retention

CRO is not simply about increasing the number of enquiries; it helps the right company move from interest through implementation to receiving value.

In B2C we mainly optimise an individual’s decisions. In B2B, decisions move between people, teams and stages.

That is why the same change can produce the opposite result. A shorter form may help a B2C user start faster, but in B2B it may weaken qualification and send more irrelevant enquiries to sales. A direct “Buy” CTA may work for a simple B2C product, while a complex B2B solution may need an intermediate step: assess fit, get an example, discuss integration or prepare arguments for the team.

We do not transfer B2C practices to B2B or vice versa. We first define who makes the decision, who uses the product, who pays and through which stages the choice must pass.

Confidentiality

User-behaviour data do not become our advertising content.

CRO may reveal product metrics, conversion, churn, revenue, behavioural segments, weak product areas, user communication, roadmap, experiments and internal team processes. We do not publish this data, research results or change details without the client’s separate permission.

Resultand client belong to the client. The reasons for its losses are also.

Public logos, testimonials and project participation descriptions are used only within the agreed scope.

We will not tell others about you either.

Formats work

CRO starts with questions, on which product needed get answer.

Full diagnostic

from $5 000

For a product that sees a loss but does not understand its causes: business context, conversion map, analytics audit, qualitative research, causes of loss, priorities and a testing plan.

Discuss conversion product

Ongoing CRO work

from $3 500 / month

For a product team that needs a continuous cycle: data → research → decisions → testing → learning.

Discuss conversion product

The exact format is defined after the first conversation, an assessment of available data and product capabilities. Scope and cost are fixed before the relevant stage starts.

Enquiry

Show, where product loses user. We will help you understand why.

In the first meeting we will define the key conversion, available data, problem scale and the right research format. If CRO is not the right first step, we will say so directly.







    We will send confirmation and a meeting link. No presentations – straight to your numbers.

    Product metrics, behavioural data and internal information will not be published or shared with third parties.

    INFO@SHEKER.AGENCY+38 097 789 84 09
    +38 098 698 94 77
    Viber · Telegram · WhatsApp

    Frequently asked questions

    Questions to ask before CRO research.

    This research is about the reasons users do not reach key product states: registration, onboarding, activation, payment, repeat use or a demo request. CRO combines quantitative data, qualitative research, product changes and result verification.

    A UX audit often evaluates the interface and ease of use. CRO starts with business and product metrics, studies user behaviour and may reveal causes outside the interface: in the offer, audience, process, pricing or the product itself.

    No. Conversion is affected by the product, audience, price, demand, traffic, brand, processes and technical constraints. We are responsible for diagnostic quality, hypothesis evidence, decision logic and correct testing.

    It depends on the challenge: product analytics, actions, funnels, cohorts, session recordings, support requests, sales calls, feedback and user access. If analytics is incomplete, the first result may be a plan to fix it.

    No. The testing method depends on traffic volume, change risk and the questions that need answering. It may be a prototype, usability test, interview, rollout, cohort analysis or A/B test.

    Yes. Depending on the product and cooperation format, Sheker.Agency may design UX/UI, create prototypes, implement changes and set up measurement. The scope is agreed separately.

    When the product has no users or stable traffic, key value is undefined, demand is absent or the team cannot implement changes. In that case, the right first step may be product research, offer testing or analytics setup.

    It depends on the journey, data quality, number of segments, user access and research depth. Timing and checkpoints are defined after the initial diagnosis.

    Yes, but CRO for eCommerce has a separate methodology and service page. This page is dedicated to digital products, SaaS, platforms and apps.

    Only with the client’s direct permission. We do not disclose product metrics, conversion, internal problems, user data, experiments or commercial results without approval.

    SEO

    SEO information

    CRO for digital products: researching causes of loss in registration, onboarding, activation, payment and repeat use. Data, hypotheses, experiments and product decisions.

    Conversion optimisation starts not with A/B tests, but with diagnosis: a conversion map, quantitative and qualitative data, reasons and hypotheses. Only then come testing and implementation. Online stores use a separate methodology — CRO for e-commerce.

    Discuss conversion.

    In the meeting we will define the key conversion, available data and research format.

    Book a meeting